WELCOME

welcome message here
disclaimer... etc

ME.ME.ME

your profile here anything? <3 my name is... i love to... bl blah blah blah bl blah bl blah blah blah blah blah

FRIENDS

friend + friend + friend + friend + friend + friend + friend +

LINKS

link + link + link + link + link + link + link + link +

ARCHIVES

August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
February 2008
March 2008
May 2008

PREVIOUS POSTS

least unethical
most unethical
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Paris King was tired of sharing her bench with Ron...
October 26 - November 01, 2007Friday, October 26, ...
Wednesday, October 3, 2007Is This Seat Taken?A dep...
Wednesday, September 26, 2007RespectA man prays to...
Sugar Hill
photoshop
1. What challenges did you encounter while trying ...

TAGBOARD

code here

ETCETERA

anything here

THANKS

[ Fonts (c) DF]
[ Layout designed by fern*]

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Dove Evolution of Beauty

  • They raised her head
  • They rounded off her shoulders more
  • Raised her eyebrows
  • Toned her face
  • Plumped her lips
  • Enhanced her cheek

I think it is think it is ethically OK to change a person's appearance in a photo like this only because they were using it for a modeling purpose on a bulletin. It would be worse if they did it without her permission. The changes they did i think were okay sense it was for a fashion bulletin but if they were to change her hair color or her eyes or her skin tone i think that would be wrong. Difference between fashion photography and photojournalist are that the fashion photo's get enhanced to the point you can't even recognize who it is in the first place they change almost everything. In photojournalism they just touch up the photo and they don't alter the person.